scott fegette

split-brained technophile

January 12, 2011
by Scott
0 comments

marshall and the product experience

World-reknowned for their wall-rattling amplifiers, Marshall has become almost a household name – you likely know their brand even if you’re not a musician. And recently they’ve decided to build on that brand loyalty with a new product direction- headphones! I’ve always been a fan of Marshall’s amps – and the mystique that’s always surrounded them – so I wanted to take a look at how they extended that experience and built on it for their new product line. Every step of the unboxing experience adds to the presentation and style of the headphones, I think you’ll agree.

DSC_5227.jpg

Looking at the boxes for both the Major and the Minor (the full and in-ear models, respectively), you can already tell something special is going on. Let’s start with the Major.

DSC_5228.jpg

The Major’s box has a small seam running about 2cm from the bottom of the box, with just two small clear decals holding the top to the bottom. No fuss, no muss- just remove or slit the decals, lift the top, and voila!

DSC_5229.jpg

The Major makes it’s entry in reclining fashion, so you can see all the small details that went into it. Knurled bronze tip, the iconic cabinet grille cloth covering the inner speakers, the Marshall logo on white above black Tolex- it’s all the little details you’ve become used to with Marshall amps remixed to powerful effect. And once you plug them in, they fit nicely but not too tight or bulky, provide a great , tight bass and crystally highs for a driver so small, and weigh up incredibly light- folding up neatly to slip into a backpack or laptop bag and still leave some room. I’m probably going to use these as my main headphones for general listening henceforth. They’re really as clean sounding as they are elegant. The bass isn’t hip-hop subwoofer low, but a tight, rounded punchy bass that sounds great across a reasonably wide span of styles. Thumbs way up.

Now, on to the Minors.

DSC_5231.jpg

The Minor’s packaging is even more curious from the outset. The box itself has a little hook loop for carrying (nice), hinting at something of distinct interest within, and apparently opens in a clamshell format. By pulling off the small decal, the top opens and slowly reveals the headphones within. But not in a static fashion- although the surface holdilng the earphones themselves starts out flat…

DSC_5232.jpg

… as the box opens further, it tilts forward ever so slightly to give a smooth final touch to the presentation.

DSC_5233.jpg

The little details on the Minors are just as cunningly well-placed – the iconic gold-capped knobs-that-go-to-eleven form the outer surface of the in-ear units, and the knurled brass cable tip is a knock off of the ‘vintage OEM’ style. The microphone fidelity is clear, and the talk/play/pause button is easy to get to in a rush. Innovatively, these ‘in-ears’ don’t actually stick IN your ear, but clip inside your ear’s ridges to hold quite tightly. So tightly, in fact, that a MMA workout and jog couldn’t rattle ‘em loose – and I’m a person who has never had success with stock in-ear headphones – always finding them fitting too poorly to use in real active situations. These, however, have now become my workout workhorses. Their fidelity is reasonably good overall with a tight low midrange and clear highs, but suffers a reduced bass response as they are technically ‘out of ear’ headphones and don’t seal the ear canal to afford a tighter low end. All told, the Minors are still several cuts above any standard earbuds and probably on par with many mid-range over-ear headphones to boot.

As I’d hoped, Marshall took their legacy of high-quality audio and built upon it with the stylistic retro product design and engaging packaging make the experience as exciting as possible from the moment you crack the seal of the box to the first downbeat of the music you crank through them. This is how a product goes from good to great – by not missing ANY of the fine details.

Kudos to Marshall for making these headphones an absolute dream from start to finish. I haven’t had that much fun cracking open a pair of boxes in a long time. To read more about the Marshall Major and Minor (and pick up a pair yourself), just head over to marshallheadphones.com. I think you’ll be equally impressed.

September 24, 2010
by Scott
0 comments

fretless experiment… gone horribly right

Starting back in 2006 or so, I’d been slowly rebuilding one of my 5-string Fender Jazz basses into an active fretless- and by 2008 had reached what I’d thought was a stopping point after damn near replacing or modifying everything on it that wasn’t made out of wood. However, I decided to leave the defretted-and-filled fingerboard uncoated as I’d been brushing up on my mad cello skillz simultaneously for some studio gigs, and decided to stick with bare wood for some consistency and see how it held up to my usual bass-abuse. However, after a brief month of attempting to use flatwounds to be kind to the wood, I relented and went back to my old standby Dean Markley DR2000 open-core (at the bridge) roundwounds, and within a few months could already see them starting to dig into the wood.

Ouch.  Can’t have that going on for long now, can we.

Now I’d tried the Jaco trick on an old J bass about 15 years ago – and used a boat epoxy to coat the fingerboard  - but never really warmed up to the final texture or alteration to the instrument’s tone.  Although the process was reportedly supposed to brighten the tone up a bit, I probably blew something in my hack job back then as it ultimately sounded a wee bit muddier (particularly in the low range) than it had been before the coating. So I was incredibly nervous now thinking about blowing my beautiful 5-string neck with a bad coat job again. SF Guitarworks to the rescue!

After talking a while with Benjamin (the SFGW shop manager) and finding that a) the process should – if done correctly – brighten things up a bit instead of the opposite, and b) there were a lot of options for the coating.

I decided to go with a cyanoacrylate coating, which is hard as shit, but absolutely beautiful sounding- most certainly a bit more defined and crisp. My fingers are mostly on string not wood, so the tactile difference was less pronounced, and the fact that I would overshoot slides about 1/16th step more than I would have normally makes me think that the added ‘slipperiness’ did change how it felt ever so slightly under my fingers. But the bonus was the almost mirror finish that it added to the bass.

You can check out the final bench photos of the neck on the SF Guitarworks blog here, although they barely do the finish justice in JPEG format. (Major props to Aaron for the work, and Benjamin for suffering my endless questions).  Seriously- I can’t recommend cyanoacrylate enough as a fingerboard coating – it turned out beautifully. I’ll post a video of it when I get back off the road and can unpack a bit.

June 8, 2010
by Scott
0 comments

sabbatical – one week in

I’m a day over one week into my sabbatical and have a few observations on how it’s gone so far:

  • Relaxation can be incredibly difficult for type-A personalities, but not entirely unattainable.
  • There is never an end to odd jobs one can find to do around, within and upon one’s home (assuming, of course, you are not a renter).
  • If you stare at any cloud long enough, you can watch it make far more than one shape.
  • I can, of course, take life way too seriously at times. Just not right now.

  • There is not a musical instrument known to man that I will not attempt to master, or at least wrestle into submission, when given the opportunity.
  • Although I fully realize it’s long-term economic ramifications, I’d give up my job and gigs in a second to be a full-time dad. Fatherhood is the most fun I’ve had in a long, long time. Who knows…
  • I can’t wait to see how chill I get after 5 more weeks of this.
  • I haven’t turned on a ‘real computer’ in a full week (except for the one powering my studio, and then only to record stuff).
  • You really can be more creative when you’re completely uncluttered or distracted. But you can also get cabin fever much faster. Finding myself ‘out for inspiration’ more often than actually writing, but my writing time is now much more focused and at least 3 times as productive as when I’m working the day job. Dizzamn.
  • Removing due dates from all my to-do lists actually resulted in them getting done a LOT faster. Maybe it’s the reduced time pressure, but that’s an interesting and cool trend.
  • Getting my inner Hunter S. Thompson out and exercised last week will help me get back to my inner, and much healthier muses. But it has been fun to blow it out a bit. :)
  • I’m really glad I decided to take this sabbatical at it’s own pace. Getting back to roots is beautiful.
  • How Des and I created such an amazing little boy in our son, Devin, is beyond me – and more in the realms of miracles and/or divine providence. He amazes and inspires me daily.
  • Although I’m not going to waste much time thinking about it now, I’m really going to miss this sabbatical when it’s over. A lot.

And now, back to the slacking. Cheers!

April 9, 2010
by Scott
0 comments

creative semi-block

It’s a bit sad that I’m headed into a sabbatical this summer but haven’t really planned what I’ll exactly be doing. I do have at least a general idea, so all is not lost.

It’s clear that I’ll be working on some personal music but I have consciously avoided thinking about it beyond one overriding goal – to wade through the last decade worth of half finished (or less) ideas that I’ve written, and recorded to varying degrees. As I’ve been mostly playing on other people’s material or projects it’s been a pretty diverse decade, but I honestly couldn’t tell you much more about what’s in that pile ‘o ideas as it’s stuff I documented in quick momentary flurries of inspiration – and didn’t spend much time with overall. The idea was that I’d eventually come back to them and finish each and every one – though at this point that obviously never happened nor was it likely to unless I made a concerted effort to set aside some time and do something about it. I guess that’s what sabbaticals are for, eh?

The hope is that either I find enough gems in that pile to justify finishing out a demo, or horrify myself into writing something better. So I’m going to call it creative semi-block- I guess when you’re starting with a surplus of ideas it can’t exactly be a tabula rasa type of situation. But given I have little memory of or faith in those ideas at this point, it is a bit unsettling. Here’s hoping the combination kicks me in the ass the right way. Keep posted.

September 3, 2009
by Scott
0 comments

snow leopard – week one comments

Short answer – Snow Leopard is proving to be the best OS X update in years. For the first time in longer than I can recall an Apple OS upgrade completed in less than an hour, did not break my existing applications and primary workflows, and actually nets positive in all significant areas (performance, usability, elegance).

That being said, not everything is hearts and flowers, but the negatives are third-party incompatibilities and not deal-breakers.

  • Line 6′s most awesome Pod Farm AudioUnit plug-in isn’t yet compatible. I’m back to using real mics and amps for now, but as most of my work is mixing/sequencing right now I’ve got some time to spare for this to resolve.
  • Xmarks bookmark sync (reasonably indispensible, but I know it’ll get ported quickly).
  • When creating a new event in iCal using the Exchange integration, it doesn’t always invite the room I’ve specified unless I drag the event to a new time, and then back to the correct one. Weird!

All things told- still two thumbs up!

May 15, 2009
by Scott
0 comments

warming up a bit

I’ve been offline in many ways for a while, and the Facebook post earlier in this blog explains part of the reason why. Things have been really busy at work the last few months, and social media has somewhat expanded to consume that part of my life that usually was spent blogging random and somewhat arcane thoughts.

That being said, it’s time for a change, partially motivated by the impending ‘migration’ of my Adobe blog to a new Movable Type framework. I’m not particularly happy with Movable Type in general, and much more comfortable with WordPress or Drupal, so although I already did merge in some of my old Adobe blog posts here a while back (just look for the ‘Adobe’ tag), I may be doing it officially soon, and dusting off this default template with one I’ve been puttering on for a little while now.

While I figure out how this will all shake out, I might very likely be temporarily distracted with this.
Pls don’t hold it against me. ;-)

I’ve been using this randomly on conference calls lately, too. Enjoy :)

March 18, 2009
by Scott
0 comments

how to get your ass handed to you- twice

You’ve got to feel at least a bit sorry for Tucker Carlson.  He gets his ass handed to him by Jon Stewart a few years back, and subsequently gets his show – Crossfire – cancelled.  Generally, in this situation (at least in my opinion), the high road would be to admit defeat, and actually listen to the criticism – that as a journalist, he failed miserably in actually presenting balanced arguments and asking real, hard questions of his guests.  But Tucker’s pride is apparently too strong for that, and after Stewart’s recent skewering of CNBC’s ‘Mad Money’ host Jim Cramer for cheerleading soon-to-fall financial giants like Bear-Stearns and AIG when he should have known better, he took his bowtie back into the ring with a stunningly infantile screed on Jon Stewart, entitled “How Jon Stewart Went Bad“.

It really is a shame that after such an ass-kicking, Tucker couldn’t have just looked the other way- but his article is absolutely missing the point.  It truly is a sad state of affairs when a marginal comedian hosting a fake news show actually asks the hard questions that Jim Cramer should have, and Tucker certainly should have back when he got his own dressing-down.  It’s not about Jon Stewart and his liberal bias – which he wears on his sleeve, and it’s not even remotely Jon blaming the recent financial meltdown on Jim Cramer personally (which of course he didn’t) – it’s the fact that supposedly objective journalists like Cramer were really in the tank for gasbags Bear-Stearns and AIG- KNOWING they were operating in the shady realms of finance, yet still softballed them on his show to pretend the sky wasn’t falling.  But Tucker misses the point entirely, and the entire article comes off as a whiny, revenge-based potshot.  Sad.

Tucker should really take a lesson from Jim Cramer, who at least had the sack to stand up and take his lumps like a man, admitting he could have done much better.  Denial really doesn’t suit you, Tucker.   But more importantly- read the comment threads at your own article, see what people are saying about you now, and face the facts that your 15 minutes of fame ended quite a while ago, when a comedian showed you how to do your own job.  You really should have left well enough alone.

February 18, 2009
by Scott
0 comments

facebook

I’m torn. I generally avoid spending too much time on social media sites cause they’re a huge time-suck, but Facebook has become a bit too addicting lately. It wasn’t as big a deal a year or so ago, but it seems that a global New Year’s resolution was for all the Facebook holdouts to finally join up. Which has been really, really awesome. I’ve connected with some people I haven’t seen since my elementary school years in Virginia, lost compatriots from Musician’s Institute, and all the cool people from high school I haven’t seen in years.

For years, I’ve gotten used to interacting with high-tech/web colleagues via social media sites like Facebook, Flickr, Twitter and the like, but the deeper life connections being made within Facebook are just too strong to avoid. Staying in touch with industry colleagues is great- don’t get me wrong – but the depth and breadth of connections on Facebook trump any of the other social sites hands-down.

So- I’m probably going to find myself posting on Twitter less and less, and Facebook more and more (especially as FB can send Twitter my status updates anyway). Interesting.

September 19, 2008
by Scott
0 comments

tax plans – obama vs. mccain

To listen to the Republican mantras this election season, one would get the idea that Obama is all about raising taxes across the board for the working man (and woman). The ‘tax-and-spend Democrat’ has become a pseudo-mythical right-wing citizen’s new world bogeyman- stealing their hard-earned money and spending it on a more bloated and intrusive government.  Or at least that’s what the Bush, and now McCain camp would have you believe.

A few charts have arisen which visualize the rather sobering truth here.

First, the Washington Post broke down how each candidate’s plan would play out across the gross income brackets in the US.
Secondly, Viveka Weiley provided a scaled version of that graph (shown below), reflecting the real weight of this distribution- i.e. with the size of each bracket drawn to scale in order to see how the cuts (and/or raises) really spread out across the entire spectrum. This graph is in my opinion the most accurate and telling, particularly when you note exactly where US median incomes fall on the scale (hint- it’s not in the high range).

Looking at how both Obama and McCain’s proposed tax plans pan out, it’s a very different story.  Obama is proposing tax cuts for 99% of the population, with the upper 1% income bracket (i.e. those making over $600k annually) footing the bill – which to me makes sense as they’re the ones profiting most from the economy. McCain’s graph, however, runs in reverse- granting his biggest tax cuts to that same abundantly-wealthy 1%, with the 60% of the country in the lower income brackets getting the shaft.

Now tax cuts should not be the measure of this election, there are a lot of other important issues to address – but this is a really sobering look at how our adopting McCain’s tax policy really would be like a third Bush term in that respect. The corporate fatcats and their cronies skate by with monstrous tax cuts, while the people in this country that scrape by on far, far less have to shoulder their tax burden.  The fact that the Republicans have been calling Obama an ‘out of touch elitist’ is  insultingly ironic given the contrast in their tax distribution plans.

I was about 85% in the Obama camp already, but add this to the disaster that is Sarah Palin (don’t even get me started), and the door just shut on McCain, at least for me.  Despite McCain’s ‘straight talk’ for change and reform, he’s really just spouting the same policy we’ve had to bear for the last 8 years.  Enough is enough.

(disclosure: For the record, given this information I would pay higher taxes in an Obama presidency, so there’s really no tax incentive for me to support him this election.  It’s just the right thing to do.  And if you wish to repost/use this graph, please respect Viveka’s licensing terms – just click the graph above to visit her original post and get details.)

September 12, 2008
by Scott
0 comments

it depends on who’s calling the shots

I normally don’t pass along political ‘chain email’, but just recieved the following and found it as sadly ironic as I did funny.  If you know who’s responsible for the original please leave a comment so I can credit ‘em appropriately, of course.

it depends on who’s calling the shots

If you’re a minority and you’re selected for a job over more qualified candidates you’re a ‘token hire.’
If you’re a conservative and you’re selected for a job over more qualified candidates you’re a ‘game changer’.

Black teen pregnancies? A ‘crisis’ in black America.
White teen pregnancies? A ‘blessed event’.

If you grow up in Hawaii you’re ‘exotic’.
Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, you’re the quintessential ‘American story’.

If you name you kid Barack you’re ‘unpatriotic’.
Name your kid Track, you’re ‘colorful’.

If you’re a Democrat and you make a VP pick without fully vetting the individual you’re ‘reckless.’
A Republican who doesn’t fully vet is a ‘maverick’.

If you spend 3 years as a community organizer growing your organization from a staff of 1 to 13 and your budget from $70,000 to $400,000, then become the first black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive that registers 150,000 new African-American voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law professor, then spend nearly 8 more years as a State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, becoming chairman of the state Senate’s Health and Human Services committee, then spend nearly 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of nearly 13 million people, sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran’s Affairs committees, you are woefully inexperienced.

If you spend 4 years on the city council and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, then spend 20 months as the governor of a state with 650,000 people, then you’ve got the most executive experience of anyone on either ticket, are the Commander in Chief of the Alaska military, and are well qualified to lead the nation should you be called upon to do, so because your state is the closest state to Russia.

If you are a Democratic male candidate who is popular with millions of people you are an ‘arrogant celebrity’.
If you are a popular Republican female candidate you are ‘energizing the base’.

If you are a younger male candidate who thinks for himself and makes his own decisions you are ‘presumptuous’.
If you are an older male candidate who makes last minute decisions you refuse to explain, you are a ‘shoot-from-the-hip-maverick’.

If you are a candidate with a Harvard law degree you are ‘an elitist – out of touch’ with the real America.
If you are a legacy (dad and granddad were admirals) graduate of Annapolis, with multiple disciplinary infractions you are a ‘hero’.

If you manage a multi-million dollar nationwide campaign, you are an ‘empty suit’.
If you are a part time mayor of a town of 7000 people, you are an ‘experienced executive’.

If you go to a South Side Chicago church, your beliefs are’extremist’.
If you believe in Creationism and don’t believe global warming is man-made, you are ‘strongly principled.’

If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and left your disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you’re a Christian.
If you have been married to the same woman with whom you’ve been wed to for 19 years and raising 2 beautiful daughters with, you’re ‘risky’.

If you’re a black single mother of 4 who waits for 22 hours after her water breaks to seek medical attention, you’re an irresponsible parent, endangering the life of your unborn child.
But, if you’re a white married mother who waits 22 hours, you’re ‘spunky’.

If you’re a 13-year-old Chelsea Clinton, the right-wing press calls you ‘First dog’.
If you’re a 17-year old pregnant unwed daughter of a Republican, the right-wing press calls you ‘beautiful’ and ‘courageous’.

If you kill an endangered species, you’re an ‘excellent hunter’.
If you have an abortion you’re not a Christian, you’re a ‘murderer’ (forget about if it happens while being date raped).

If you teach abstinence only in sex education, you get teen parents.
If you teach responsible age appropriate sex education, including the proper use of birth control, you are ‘eroding the fiber of society’.

Yeah, we sure do have a ‘liberal media’ in this country, don’t we… >:/